iMovie / Video Project
Video by Miranda Fletcher, Kendra Myers and Tyler Staley
The following video project was meant to introduce us to the mechanics of the Apple iMovie software. However, having previously studied film and video, I found the limiting and clunky editing formats of this program to be frustrating and highly annoying. As such, much of what I contributed in terms of actual editing of the project was done in Final Cut Pro.
Grievances aside, the video itself was fun to create. The basic premise is a student who begins to experience sudden and near total censorship in the middle of his day. He then notices it also effects the world around him. He becomes panicked, trying to find out why everything is happening.
Below is the storyboard our group came up with for the project:
Grievances aside, the video itself was fun to create. The basic premise is a student who begins to experience sudden and near total censorship in the middle of his day. He then notices it also effects the world around him. He becomes panicked, trying to find out why everything is happening.
Below is the storyboard our group came up with for the project:
We also have a mind map to help give an idea of the layout of work done, as well as the basis of our working concept.
Not much changed going from storyboard to production. Below you can see the finished product.
Here, we also have the artist statement for the final project, outlining our inspiration, means, and topics addressed.
Here, we also have the artist statement for the final project, outlining our inspiration, means, and topics addressed.
iMovie Artist Statement
"For our iMovie project we decided to take a comical route.
The main premise of our short is comedy through censorship, ranging from
visual and written to vocal and audio. There was a bit of concern at first upon
learning that coarse language was not allowed to be used. Coincidentally, this
rule served as somewhat of an inspiration for making the project what it is: a
brief study in censorship and its effect on us as individuals. We achieved this
in a number of ways: by use of visual effects, sound effects, music, green
screen work, and clever jokes that include breaking the fourth wall.
In this story our main character Tyler doses off while working on
a school assignment, only to find that when he awakes he can no longer use profanity.
In a stunned stupor he finds a place to relax and clear his mind, once again
drifting off to sleep. This time Tyler finds himself in the Calder Art
Center. To his horror not only are his words censored this time, but any visual
and literary media is also censored. Driven to madness he shouts to the
sky in confusion and anger only to have a strange figment of himself break the
fourth wall and inform him what is truly happening. Will Tyler escape from his
nightmare? Or will he never use profanity again?
The primary conflict addressed in this project is that of freedom
of speech versus the courtesy of censorship. Though we all take steps to make
sure that not everything on our minds is blatantly spoken aloud, when this
filter is applied to us unwillingly, it can prove incredibly stifling to those
who are comfortable with such means of expression. Though it is true that
curses and profane language carry with them a certain potency and can be
offensive when used in a hostile manner, when they are used in the proper
circles and without intent of harm, there is little offense that can be derived
beyond personal bias.
On the surface, we do see that the sudden inability to say what we
know is being said is funny; indeed, sometimes the censor sound can gain more
laughs than the original curse in some cases. Going off of this, why does it
make sense to replace these words with something else when the intent, and
therefore the word that is meant to be used, is still there? Comedians such as
Louis C.K. address this point often, and it remains a pertinent question that
still doesn’t have a clear answer. In a similar vein, visual censorship is
brought into question in our project as well. Why are certain displays of
physical appearance mandatory to cover, while some are considered holistic
examples of fine culture? What’s more, the exploration of sexuality is, outside
of extremes, considered relatively healthy; so why stifle examples of things
that could lead people to become more comfortable with themselves? Even rich
history can be put on the cutting board, with book censorships and bannings in
schools that take knowledge and understanding away from the educational
experience.
Ultimately, our project
is a small, fun exploration of these issues. We do not necessarily seek to cast
blame for censorship; merely to address how odd it can be at times. Certainly,
if someone decides to scream a curse word into the air, it might be better that
people not hear it. Censorship has its place, but there are still times, such
as in our main character’s case, where it is most certainly out of place."


No comments:
Post a Comment